Nuts & Bolts at the Court of Administrative Hearings: Differences from District Court Proceedings
Allen Cook Barr, Assistant Attorney General
November 12, 2025
Overview
Issues That Pervade Practice
Pretrial Practice
Trial
Post-Decision
Overarching Themes
Role of CAH
Flexibility
Due Process
Representation
District Court
Natural persons may represent themselves
Corporations and other entities must be represented by an attorney
Nicollet Restoration, Inc. v. Turnham, 486 N.W.2d 753 (Minn. 1992)
Representation
Administrative Procedure
Parties may be represented by counsel. Minn. R. 1400.5800
But CAH generally permits business entities to also appear "through an owner or executive with authority to speak for that entity." In re U Ride Transportation, No. 71-1004-37433, 2021 WL 6186495, at
*7 n.84 (OAH Dec. 22, 2021)
Initiating Case
District Court
Case initiated by serving complaint.
Minn. R. Civ. P. 3.01
Filing may not come until later.
Minn. R. Civ. P. 5.04
Administrative Procedure
"A contested case is commenced, subsequent to the
assignment of a judge, by the service of a notice of and
order for hearing by the agency."
Minn. R. 1400.5600, subp. 1
Initiating Case
Initiating Case
Judge Removal
District Court, Minn. R. Civ. P. 63.03
Once as of right, no showing required
Notice must be served within 10 days of recieving notice of who judge is
Determined in first instance by judge to be removed, may obtain reconsideration from chief judge. Minn. R. Gen. Pract. 106
Initiating Case
Judge Removal
Administrative Procedure, Minn. R. 1400.6400
No removal as of right, must show prejudice or bias
No deadline to file affidavit of prejudice, but must be at least 5 days before hearing
Determined by the chief administrative law judge
Initiating Case
Content of Notice and Order for Hearing, Minn. R. 1400.5600,
subp. 2
Identify ALJ and time/place of hearing or prehearing (A-B)
Statutory authority to hold hearing or take proposed
action (C)
State of allegations/issues and law that was violated or
otherwise controls case (D)
NOTICE! (E-P)
No answer or other affirmative pleading is required
Initiating Case
Service
At least 30 days before hearing
Personal service permitted as in district court. Minn. R. 1400.5550, subp. 3
Service by mail is also permitted. Minn. R. 1400.5550, subp. 2
Must be "addressed to the last known address of the person"
Initiating Case
Initiating Case
Filing, Minn. R. 1400.5550
E-Filing (may be required by ALJ order or some statutes)
Mail
Personal Delivery
Fax
Joinder of Parties and "Claims"
Claims
District court
Unrelated claims, counterclaims, cross-claims, third-party claims. MInn. R. Civ. P. 13, 14, 18
Joinder of Parties and "Claims"
Claims
Administrative Procedure
Agencies may consolidate cases before referring them to CAH.
Minn. R. 1400.6350, subp. 2
Joinder of Parties and "Claims"
Claims
Administrative Procedure
Unless agency would have jurisdiction over counterclaims, they need not be raised in same proceeding.
Cf. Wilson v. Comm'r of Rev., 619 N.W.2d 194 (Minn. 2000)
Similarly, res judicata and collateral estoppel do not apply rigidly to the agency, especially when the applciation would contravene public policy, there are changed circumstances, or the proceedings involve a recurring matter
Joinder of Parties and "Claims"
Post-Referral Consolidation of Cases
Agency may amend notice of hearing at any point before hearing to raise new issues, so long as respondent is given reasonable time to prepare. Minn. R. 1400.5600, subp. 5
Joinder of Parties and "Claims"
Post-Referral Consolidation of Cases
Any party may move consolidate cases post-referral. Minn. R. 1400.6350, subp. 1. Court considers:
Substantially the same issues of fact and law
Holding in one case would affect the rights of parties in another case
Save time and costs
Would not prejudice any party
Joinder of Parties and "Claims"
Post-Referral Consolidation of Cases
Any party may petition for severance. Minn. R. 1400.6350, subp. 7. Requirements:
Must be at least 7 days before hearing
Severance is mandatory if consolidation would prejudice the party seeking severance
Joinder of Parties and "Claims"
Parties
District court
Mandatory and permissive joinder of parties Minn. R. Civ. P. 19-20; Intervention as of right and permissive Minn. R. 24
Administrative Procedure
Agencies may conconsolidate cases against multiple parties
E.g., In re the Journeyworker-Electrician License of Lesnau, No. 60-1902-37191, 2021 WL 4184607, at *1 n.1 (OAH Sept. 9, 2021)
Joinder of Parties and "Claims"
Intervention
Non-Parties may intervene under Minn. R. 1400.6200, subps. 1-3
Must be timely (which is not defined)
Petition must identify statutory basis if one exists
If not statutory basis, must identify how intervenor will be affected
Must identify grounds and purpose for intervention
Existing parties have 7 days to object
What must a non-party do to present testimony at a hearing?
Intervene
File Petition of Intent to Intervene
Serve Topic List
Obtain ALJ Permission
Make Demand at Hearing
What must a non-party do to present testimony at a hearing?
cle.allenbarr.com/iv.html
Joinder of Parties and "Claims"
Intervention
ALJs may permit the public to present testimony or evidence, or question witnesses, without granting intervention. Minn. R. 1400.6200, subp. 5
Pre-Discovery Practice
District Court
Motions to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings under Minn. R. Civ. P. 12
Administrative Procedure
There is no such thing as a motion to dimiss. Parties may move for summary disposition
Instead, first substantive event is usually prehearing conference
Pre-Discovery Practice
Prehearing Conference
Similar to 26.06 conference, but presided over by ALJ
Usually telephonic
Topics to be covered listed in Minn. R. 1400.6500
Covers protective order, time periods for discovery, itermediate deadlines, filing of exhibit and witness lists, date of hearing, and any need for accommodations
Pre-Discovery Practice
Default
District Court: Appropriate if defendant fails to plead or otherwise defend. Minn. R. Civ. P. 55.01
Administrative Procedure
"A default occurs when a party fails to appear without the prior consent of the judge at a prehearing conference, settlement conference, or a hearing or fails to comply with any interlocutory orders of the judge."
Minn. R. 1400.6000
Which discovery tool is not available at CAH?
Requests for Admission
Initial Disclosures
Interrogatories
Requests for Production
Depositions
Which discovery tool is not available at CAH?
cle.allenbarr.com/disco.html
Discovery
"Any means of discovery available pursuant to the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Court of Minnesota is allowed." Minn. R. 1400.6700, subp. 2
Some differences:
"Initial" Disclosures
Requests for Admission
Subpoenas
Discovery
"Initial" Disclosures
Must disclose within 10 days of demand by other party
Names, addresses, and brief summary of testimony for witnesses a party intends to call
Written or recorded statements made by or on behalf of the party
Identify exhibits (but not the exhibits themselves)
Discovery
Requests for Admission
Response requried in 10 days instead of 30. Minn. R. 1400.6800
Discovery
Subpoenas, Minn. R. 1400.7000
Must requested from the ALJ
Statement demonstrating the potential relevance of the testimony or evidence sought
Identify any documents sought with specificity
Include the full name and home or business address of all persons to be subpoenaed
If known, the date, time, and place for responding
Motion Practice
District Court
Dispositive Motions, Minn. R. Gen. Pract. 115.03
Principal Brief: 28 days before hearing
Response Brief: 14 days before hearing
Reply Brief: 7 days before hearing
Non-Dispositive Motions, Minn. R. Gen. Pract. 115.04
Principal Brief: 21 days before hearing
Response Brief: 14 days before hearing
Reply Brief: 7 days before hearing
35 page limit
Motion Practice
Administrative Procedure, Minn. R. 1400.6600
No right to a hearing
Response due 10 working days after recieving
No reply brief
25 page limit
Motion Practice
Appealing Non-Final Orders
District Court: preliminary relief, jurisdictional and immunity iusses, certification, and discretionary review can all get you to the COA
Motion Practice
Appealing Non-Final Orders
Administrative Procedure, Minn. R. 1400.7600
Any party may request that a pending motion be certififed to the agency, except for motions on admissibility or CAH rules
Certification unavailable when ALJ is final decisionmaker
ALJ decides whether to certify motion:
Motion Practice
Appealing Non-Final Orders
ALJ decides whether to certify motion:
Controlling question of law with substantial ground for difference of opinion?
Determination advance termination of hearing?
Delay between motion and certifying adversely affect prevailing party?
Waiting render the matter moot?
Necessary to promote the development of a full record to prevent remand?
Issue is solely within the agency's expertise?
Evidentiary Hearings
Hearings are generally open to the public, but ALJ may close them for good cause. Minn. R. 1400.7800
Hearings are digitally recorded, there is no court reporter
Which portions of the Minnesota Rules of Evidence apply at CAH?
All of Them
All But the Hearsay Rules
All But the Expert, Hearsay, and Best Evidence Rules
None of Them
Which discovery tool is not available at CAH?
cle.allenbarr.com/roe.html
Evidentiary Hearings
Rules of Evidence do not generally apply. See Minn. R. 1400.7300, subp. 1.
Instead, the ALJ may admit "all evidence which possesses probative value, including hearsay, if it is the type of evidence on which reasonable, prudent persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of their serious affairs"
But see In re Remedial Action Order Issued to Page, No. 82-0500-37640, 2021 WL 5763332, at *2 (OAH Nov. 16, 2021)
Alternative Dispute Resolution
District Court: generally required in most cases. Minn. R. Gen. Pract. 114.04(b)
Administrative Procedure: encouraged, but not required. Minn. R. 1400.5950, subp. 3(C)
Settlement conferences, however, may be unilaterally requested by one party or ordered by ALJ. Minn. R. 1400.6550, subp. 2
Decision and Post-Decision Procedures
Unlike district court judgments, ALJ decisions are not necessarily final agency actions
Specifics regarding finality of decision vary from statute to statute
If a decision is not final, then agency must provide opportunity for parties to submit exceptions. Minn. Stat. § 14.61, subp. 1
If a decision is final, then appeal rights to court of appeals are determined by statute. E.g., Minn. Stat. § 326B.89, subd. 8
Decision and Post-Decision Procedures
Remand, Minn. Stat. § 14.62, subd. 2b
Mandatory if agency rejects summary disposition, default, or additional fact finding is necessary after appeal or clerical error